学术
摘 要:
哲学在经历了理性时代的岿峰后，开始了曼为深刻的对理性的反思。在存在与虚无之中、在解构之中，人的存在处于一个怎样的位置？相比较而言，我们传承而采的历史又怎样理解？尤其是上个世纪的两次世界大战，人们看到了理性旗帜下人性的灰暗。也正是在反恩二战的过程中，波谱尔写作了他的《开放社会及其敌人》，并提出了历史没有意义，那么此种无意义是什么意义上采讲的？其内在又隐含着什么？文章旨在通过渡谱尔的思路朱寻找一个问题的出口。[著者文摘]
文章出处:
《河北建筑科技学院学报：社会科学版》-2006年23卷4期 -74-75页
栏目信息:
分 类 号:
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1008-9896（2006）04-0074-02
Significance of history ——Rethinking of cal popper＇ s ＂Is history significant？＂
LI Jin-xin （Thc Public and Administrative School, Nanjing Nomal University, Nanjing 210097, China）
Abstract:
Philosophy experienced the peak in the age of rea.,.on, we began a more profound, reflection to reason. In being, nothingness and deeonstrtuetion, what position people exist in？ Comparatively speaking, how can we understand the history that we fell heir to？ Especially in the two world wars last century, people have seen gloom of humanity uoder the banner of reason, in the process of reflecting on World War Ⅱ, Popper wrote his ＂The Open Society and Its Enemies＂ and proposed the history did not have significance. What is the point to the meaningless history？ Also what implicit in its internal？ In this article,Ⅰ want to find a problem exported from Popper.[著者文摘]
Key words:
history ; significance of history ; rationalism
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com