摘 要:
王仁紡《刊谬补缺切韵》第一种,即敦煌本王韵,世称"王一".因其残缺较甚,195个韵中只有53个韵小韵字没有残缺.本文通过歌韵和去声部分对"王一"残卷和"王三"反切进行比较,得出王一和王三大体相合.并对姜亮夫先生提出的"王一"反切用字与《广韵》合者十之九提出质疑,通过去声"王一"、《唐韵》和《广韵》的比较,可以看出《广韵》的反切用字并非与"王一"合者十之九,而与《唐韵》相合者甚多.[著者文摘]

文章出处:
《济宁师范专科学校学报》-2007年28卷1期 -35-38页
栏目信息:
分 类 号:
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1004-1877(2007)01-0035-04
A Re - analysis of Fanqie Spelling in Wang Yi, Wang San and Guang Yun
CHEN Fang (School of Language Arts Gui Zhou University,Guizhou 550000)
Abstract:
The first Version, has been version of Kan Miu Bu Que Qie Yun by widely known as Wang Yi. Being fragme Wang Renxu, that is, Wang Yun of the Dunhuang ntary, it has only the first yuns left complete in the 53 of all the 195 yuns. This paper is intended to make a comparison between the fanqie spellings in Wang Yi and Wang San from the perspectives of ge yun and the third tone, and comes to conclude that the two versions are similar to each other to some extent. Furthermore, ward by Jiang Liangfu about the percentage of similarity sentative characters of fanqie spelling, and an analytical Yun and Guang Yun with a conclusion that Guang Yun in this paper, doubts are raised on the opinions put forbetween Wang Yi and Guang Yun in terms of the repre comparison is carried out on that among Wang Yi, Tang is closer to Tang Yun than to Wang Yi in terms of the representative characters of fanqie spelling.[著者文摘]
Key words:
Wang Yi ; Wang San ; Guang Yun ; Fanqie spelling

学术
















cqvip.com