维普资讯
发表评论我要收藏点击“我要推荐”按钮复制地址,将本页推荐给别人看,自己就可以获得积分奖励!点击“我要推荐”按钮复制地址,推荐文章给别人看,自己就可以获得积分奖励。

腐蚀管道剩余强度评价方法及其应用

下载全文
[全文大小:185 K]

何东升 郭简 张鹏

西南石油大学机电工程学院,四川成都610500

石油学报
订阅本刊
国际标准刊号:ISSN 0253-2697
国内统一刊号:CN 11-2128

摘  要:

分析了管道腐蚀缺陷各种评价方法的理论基础,导出了相应的评价方法的评价公式。将现有的标准归纳为3种基本的准则,即B31G准则、API579准则和DNVRP—F101准则。理论和数值分析表明:B31G准则评价的保守性低于API579准则。在单一荷载下,3种准则的保守性从高到低依次为API579准则、B31G准则、DNVRP—F101准则,评价复杂程度从高到低依次为API579准则、DNVRP—F101准则和B31G准则。鉴于大多数管段主要在单一内压载荷下运行,为了降低评价的保守性,简化评价过程,对于单一荷载和简单缺陷,腐蚀管道的剩余强度仍按B31G准则或DNVRP—F101准则进行评价。[著者文摘]

文章出处:

《石油学报》-2007年28卷6期 -125-128页

Acta Petrolei Sinica

栏目信息:

石油工程

分 类 号:

TE732

文献标识码:

A

文章编号:

0253-2697(2007)06-0125-04

相关文章:

参考文献(15篇)  主题相关

[参考文献]

Assessment method for remaining strength of corroded pipeline and its application

He Dongsheng, Guo Jian, Zhang Peng (School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

Abstract:

On the basis of the theoretical foundations of various assessment methods for corroded pipeline, the assessment formulas for every method were deduced according to their basic hypothesis and calculative method for the surface correction factor of through wall crack. The current criterions were concluded into three basic types of ASME B31G criterion, API 579 criterion and DNV RP F101 criterion. The theoretical and numerical analyses show that the API 579 criterion is more conservative than the B31G criterion. The conservations of three criterions become lower in the order of API 579 criterion, ASME B31G criterion and DNV RP F101 criterion, and the assessment complexity of three criterions is in the order of API 579 criterion, DNV RP F101 criterion and ASME B31G criterion. Because some pipe-section operates mainly under single inner pressure, the ASME B31G criterion or DNV RP F101 criterion should be used to assess the remaining strength in the corroded pipeline to reduce the conservation of assessment and simplify the assessment programs.[著者文摘]

Key words:

corroded pipeline; remaining strength; corroded fault ; assessment criterion; assessment formula

收稿日期: 2006-11-21
修订日期: 2007-04-04

基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目(No.50674077)和中国石油天然气集团公司中青年创新基金项目(04E70490)联合资助.

作者简介:

何东升,男,1964年6月生,2001年获大连理工大学计算力学博士学位,现为西南石油大学机电工程学院副教授,主要从事管道强度、智能井等方面的研究。E-mail:dongsheng_he@sina.com

中国业务群个人门户,免费下载!
更多>>相关文章
天元数据 维普资讯 版权所有 Copyright © 2001-2008 cqvip.com Inc. All rights reserved.
渝ICP证 B2-20050021  违法和不良信息举报中心
建议使用:1024x768分辨率,16位以上颜色