学术
摘 要:
尽管传统形式逻辑在概念问题上不研究大于1的n元名词而只研究仅占n分之1的1元名词，可是在这n分之1的研究中仍然存在着不少缺陷。譬如，关于概念的定义至今仍不能自圆其说；有些概念种类划分不合理；给概念内涵下的定义产生歧义；给普遍概念下的定义过宽；等等。传统形式逻辑是真正的逻辑科学，我们剖析的目的是深深地切望传统形式逻辑深刻正确的主导思想和久胜不衰的理论成果得到发扬光大。[著者文摘]
文章出处:
《黔南民族师范学院学报》-2005年25卷5期 -20-25页
栏目信息:
分 类 号:
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1005-6769（2005）05-0020-06
相关文章:
Analysis on Contemporary Formal Logic of Traditional Concepts
GONG Qi - rong （ Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China）
Abstract:
Although traditional formal logic studies one - dement names only proportional to 1/n rather than n - element names （ n 〉 1 ）, the 1/n research still remains some flaws. For instance, the definitions of the concepts can not justify themsdves yet; some categories of concepts are not properly sorted; the definitions for connotations of concepts create ambiguity; the definitions for general concepts are too extensive, etc. The traditional formal logic is the authentic science of logic. The purpose of our analysis is to expect the inheritance of the penetrating and correct guiding ideology of traditional formal logic and to wish prevalence of its long - tested theoretical fruits.[著者文摘]
Key words:
concept problem; n- element names; contemporary formal logic; traditional formal logicAnalysis on Contemporary Formal Logic of Traditional Concepts
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com