摘 要:
讨论了“仅是矛盾”和“矛盾被证”、辩证“鹰”派的反驳和逻辑派的回应、几个悖论的消解等,评述了维特根斯坦和哈克的“自涉”、克林的“悲观”情怀,批评了爱因斯坦的“轻率概括”,突显出谬误学、批判性思维的重要性。[著者文摘]
关 键 词:
文章出处:
《重庆工学院学报》-2007年21卷10期 -51-55页
栏目信息:
分 类 号:
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1671-0924(2007)05-0051-05
Simple Resolution on "Strengthened Liar Paradox"--Criticism on Tarski, Godel, Einstein's related "theories"
HUANG Zhan-ji (School of Philosophy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
Abstract:
In the middle of the 20th century, westem authorities started to develop "informal logic" to make up the deficiency of "formal logic" and to increase "critical thinking" of human beings. They have achieved successful results. This paper aims to respond to such a historical "breakthrough" by trying to resolve the "strengthened liar paradox" and criticizing some western authorities in related field of paradox.[著者文摘]
Key words:
strengthened liar paradox; complex proposition fallacy; the "eagle" dialectical school; a contradiction proved to be true; resolution in "high" and "low" standard

学术















cqvip.com