学术
摘 要:
对分析命题和综合命题进行一番历时性梳理，剖析奎因在论证上的偏颇之处：其一，混淆了定义与同义词之间的界限；其二，扩大了同义词的范畴；其三，错误地将词项同义的条件限定在满足“所有语境”的情况下，从而得出结论奎因对形而上学的批判并不构成挑战。[著者文摘]
文章出处:
《重庆工学院学报》-2007年21卷16期 -47-50页
栏目信息:
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1671-0924（2007）08-0047-04
On Distinction between Analytic Proposition and Synthetic Proposition ——On Refutation of Quine＇s Argumentation
XIAO Xian （School of Foreign Languages, Chongqing Institute of Technology, Chongqing 400050, China）
Abstract:
This paper focuses on Quine＇ s challenge to the analytic-synthetic distinction by metaphysics, and holds that the fallacies of Quine in his argumentation can be recapitulated in three aspects： （1） blurring the demarcation between definition and synonymy; （2） over-generalizing the category of synonymy. Actually it is unnecessary to make two terms synonymous by definition; （3） misunderstanding the condition of synonymy. Therefore a conclusion can be drawn that Quine＇ s argumentation does not pose any challenge to metaphysics.[著者文摘]
Key words:
analytic proposition; synthetic proposition; synonymy; definition
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com