学术
摘 要:
20世纪前半期关于新旧史学关系的探讨，参与学者人数之多，学术观点之复杂，在整个中国近代史学史上都是罕见的。本文对这场学术探讨进行了系统的梳理和评论，认为它在社会思潮、学术风气的演变以及近代史学学科逐渐完善的客观需求等因素的影响下，呈现了阶段性发展的特点。[著者文摘]
文章出处:
《安徽史学》-2008年1期 -64-69页
分 类 号:
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1005-605X（2008）01-0064-06
相关文章:
Review on the debate between the new historiography and the old historiography
YE Jian （The institute of Historiography,Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875 ,China）
Abstract:
A lot of scholars who published various viewpoints, threw themselves into the discussion between the new historiography and the old historiography in the first half of 20th century, which is infrequent in the process of modem historiography. This disquisition collates the discussion, commenting on it, which thinks that it developed in different stages under affection of some factors such as the transition of society, the evolvement of academic atmosphere, the desirability of modem subjects of historiography development.[著者文摘]
Key words:
the new historiography and the old historiography; the current historiography and the past historiography;development on different stages
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com