学术
摘 要:
我国《民法通则》及《关于适用（中华人民共和国民事诉讼法）若干问题的意见》对诉讼时效法律效力的规定实质上是一种“干预”模式，这种模式既不符合诉讼时效制度的本来目标，也不符合通过私人行为实现法律控制的国家策略，从干预模式到“自治”模式的转换势在必行。同时，那种试图通过法官释明来纠正自治模式可能带来的局限的方式并不是真正有效和适当的方式。[著者文摘]
文章出处:
《现代法学》-2008年30卷1期 -64-73页
栏目信息:
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1001-2397（2008）01-0064-10
The Individual Self-governance Turn of the Effectiveness of Limitation of Action： From the Angle of both Substantive and Procedural Law
HU0 Hai-hong （Law School of Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China）
Abstract:
In nature, the provisions of the effectiveness of limitation of action in the General Principles of Civil Law of the PRC and the Supreme People＇ s Court＇ s Opinions Concerning Application of the Civil Procedure Act are of an ＂interference mode＂, which neither accords with the real purposes of limitation regime nor complies with the state policies that encourage individual acts to exercise legal control. As such, a turn from interference to self-governance is inevitable. Furthermore, the endeavor to correct the potential defects arising out of or pertaining to self-governance by way of interpretation of judges is not effective or proper.[著者文摘]
Key words:
limitation of action ; effectiveness ; individual self-governance ; interpretation
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com