学术
摘 要:
莎士比亚和乔治·威尔金斯合作的《泰尔亲王配力克里斯》与托马斯·海伍德的《伦敦四学徒》都是传奇剧，其场景以地理范围广大而著称。本文运用约翰·吉利斯“差异地理学”的概念对两剧进行了分析，认为《伦敦四学徒》中的差异地理学体现出明显的欧洲中心主义和男性主导的意识形态，而《配力克里斯》不仅在地理上，而且在精神认知层面，都倾向和指归于希腊城邦潘塔波里斯。后者中，地理流动性为诗性地理学服务，诗性地理学涵括了地理流动性。另一方面，从当时的历史背景来看，地理流动性与贵族意识形态之间存在着复杂的交互作用。从意识形态上说，《配力克里斯》基本上是保守的，尽管它地理流动性强；而《伦敦四学徒》更直接地反映了它的时代，通过地理流动性以贵族意识形态颂扬了市民阶层。莎士比亚和威尔金斯及海伍德的戏剧实践代表了传奇剧这一体裁蕴含的丰富可能性。[著者文摘]
关 键 词:
文章出处:
《外国文学研究》-2008年30卷1期 -94-100页
栏目信息:
Geography and Ideology in Pericles and Four Prentises of London
Hao Tianhu （ D. degree from Columbia University in 2006 and is currently lecturer in the Department of English, Peking University （Beijing 100871, China）.
Abstract:
Both Shakespeare and George Wilkins＇ s Pericles and Thomas Heywood＇s Foure Prenrises of London are romances outstanding in geographical scope. Analyzing the two plays through John Gillies＇ s concept of ＂geography of difference,＂ this essay argues that the geography of difference in Foure Prentises of London enhances the crude ideology of Eurocentric and masculine hegemony, whereas Pericles leans towards and aims at Pentapolis, the Greek city-state, not only physically and geographically, butalso spiritually and epistemologically. In the latter play, geographical mobility subserves poetic geography, and poetic geography subsumes geographical mobility. On the other hand, in the larger contemporary contexts, geographical mobility interacts intricately with an aristocratic ideology in both plays. In ideology Pericles is basically a conservative play despite its geographical mobility, while Foure Prentises of London responds more keenly to its times and glorifies the middling rank with an aristocratic ideology through geographical mobility. Shakespeare and Wilkins＇ s and Heywood＇ s dramatic practices illustrate the multiple possibilities contained in the genre of romance.[著者文摘]
Key words:
Pericles, Prince of Tyre The Foure Prentises of London geography ideology
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com