学术
摘 要:
从文化精神角度来看，鲁迅与新历史主义作家都秉持着“历史循环论”的基本观点，对正史的叙述强烈的质疑，进而在野史轶闻中寻找历史本真；关于历史与文学关系的问题上，两者都认同历史仅为文学提供了言说的舞台，文学为了揭示精神实质，完全可以砸碎时空的局限，使传统与现代并置于同一写作空间。从艺术手法上看，以鲁迅《故事新编》为代表的作品与新历史主义的小说都采用了反讽和虚构的言说手法。[著者文摘]
文章出处:
《唐山师范学院学报》-2007年29卷6期 -10-13页
栏目信息:
分 类 号:
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1009-9115（2007）06-0010-04
Lu Xun and New Historical Principle Literature
WANG Ji-peng, HAN Xu （Postgraduate Department of Liaoning Normal University, Liaoning Dalian 116029, China）
Abstract:
At the beginning of 20^th century, Lu Xun and the other new historical principle writers believed in the basic idea of historical cycle. Meanwhile, Lu Xun expressed his view very skillfully, especially in new organization of traditional story. All of these are taken on the literature of new historical principle in the 1980s. In the other aspects, there is a foundation to compare Lu Xun with new historical principle writers. In cultural and spiritual view, Lu Xun and new historical principle writers both persisted in the point of ＂historical cycle＂. They also suspected the official historical depiction and would like to find facts from unofficial history. At the same time, in their opinion, history only lends the background to literature. In order to express its essence, the works can put by-past and present story in same place. In compositional skill view, they were both good at irony and fiction.[著者文摘]
Key words:
Lu Xun; new historical principle literature; the view of history; specialization of time
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究“十五”规划第一批研究项目（01JA750.11-44031）
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com