学术
应用微卫星标记分析圈养大熊猫遗传多样性
王芳[1,2,3] 彭真信[4] 张金国[4] 田亮[1,3] 韩红兵[1,3] 曹之晨[1,3] 张志和[5] 沈富军[5] 李德生[6] 张和民[6] 张立波[2] 连正兴[3]
[1]中国农业大学,农业生物技术国家重点实验室,北京100094 [2]中国农业大学动物医学院,北京100094 [3]中国农业大学动物科技学院,北京100094 [4]北京动物园,北京100044 [5]成都大熊猫繁育研究基地,成都610081 [6]中国保护大熊猫研究中心,汶川623006
摘 要:
以来源于成都大熊猫繁育研究基地和中国保护大熊猫研究中心的34只圈养大熊猫（分为a群体和b群体）和7只圈养野生大熊猫（圈养野生群）作为研究对象，利用AY161177-AY161218、Ame-μ5～Ame-μ70和g001-g905等30个微卫星标记对其遗传多样性现状进行分析，并探讨保持圈养大熊猫遗传多样性的方法．微卫星数据表明，30个微卫星标记多态性好（PIC=0．621～0．640），圈养大熊猫遗传多样性水平（a群体：A=5．48，Ho=0．475，He=0．696；b群体：A=5．24，H0=0．453，He=0．719；圈养野生群：A-3．80，Ho=0．514，He=0．725）高于6个濒危物种（Ho=0．210-0．390，He=0．150～0．430）但低于3个非濒危物种（Ho=0．620-0．710），圈养大熊猫遗传多样性水平都保持在较高水平，但圈养群遗传多样性水平与圈养野生群相比有所降低．F统计量及基因流Nm分析结果证明，a、b两群体间遗传分化程度不高（Nm=2．610，Fst=0．0874，F／t=0．4116），存在个体交换和一定程度的近交，b群体近交程度高于a群体（a群体Fis=0．3221，b群体Fas=0．3983）．因此，现阶段圈养大熊猫的管理重点是避免近交和遗传多样性丧失，将圈养大熊猫种群作为同一管理单元，把纠正大熊猫系谱中的错误、科学选择大熊猫个体进行群体间交流作为关键点，利用微卫星技术保持和提高大熊猫种群的遗传多样性水平．[著者文摘]
文章出处:
《生物化学与生物物理进展》-2007年34卷12期 -1279-1287页
栏目信息:
分 类 号:
Studies on Genetic Diversity of Captive Giant Pandas （Ailuropoda melanoleuca） Based on Microsatellite DNA Markers
WANG Fang, PENG Zhen-Xin, ZHANG Jin-Guo, TIAN Liang, HAN Hong-Bing, CAO Zhi-Chen, ZHANG Zhi-He, SHEN Fu-Jun, LI De-Sheng, ZHANG He,Min ZHANG Li-Bo, LIAN Zheng-Xing （ 1 State Key Laboratories for A groBiotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China; 2） College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China; 3） College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China; 4 Beijing ZOO, Beijing 100044, China; 5） Chengdu Research Bose of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu 610081, China; 4） China Research and Conservation Center for the Giant Panda, Wenchuan 623006, China）
Abstract:
34 captive Giant Pandas （captive population： including a population and b population） and 7 captive wild Giant Pandas （captive wild population） are study objects. Their blood samples are got from Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding and China Research and Conservation Center for the Giant Panda. 30 microsatellite DNA markers including AY161177- AY161218, Ame- μ5 - Ame- μ70 and g001 - g905 are used to investigate the actual state of genetic diversity within and between samples. Meanwhile, the measures how to maintenance and improve genetic diversity of Giant Pandas are discussed. The information for microsatellite locus showed that 30 microsatellite DNA markers were polymorphic （PIC=0.621 -0.640） and the genetic diversity of 41 captive Giant Pandas was higher （a population： A=5.48, Ho=0.475, He=0.690; b population： A=5.24, Ho=0.453, He=0.719; captive wild population： A =3.80, Ho=0.514, He=0.725） than that of other 6 endangered species（Ho=0.210 - 0.390, He=0. 150-0.430）, but was lower than that of 3 non-endangered species. 41 captive Giant Pandas maintenanced high genetic diversity. However, compared to 7 captive wild Giant Pandas, the genetic diversity of 34 captive Giant Pandas degraded. The date of F-statistics and gene flow （of 25 microsatellite locus Nm=2.610, Fst=0.0874, Fit= 0.4116） indicated that a population and b population exchanged individuals resulting to inbreeding. There was a low level of genetic variabilities between a population and b population. The inbreeding level of b population was higher than that of a population （a population： Fis=0.3221, b population： Fis=0.3983）. Therefore, at the present, the focus of management of captive Giant Panda should shift to avoiding the inbreeding and the loss of genetic diversity. The captive populations of Giant Panda should be in the same management unit. Retrieving pedigree and chosing the fittest exchange individual are the key point. Microsatellite technologey is the key way to protect and improve genetic diversity of captive Giant Pandas.[著者文摘]
Key words:
microsatellite, captive Giant Panda （A iluropoda rnelanoleuca）, genetic diversity
基金资助:
大熊猫国际合作资金项目（WX0308）.
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com