摘 要:
商标权的撤销和无效都是商标权终止的原因。世界大多数国家和地区商标法对撤销制度和无效制度都明确加以区分,而我国现行《商标法》中没有“商标权无效”的概念,而是将上述两种情况统称为“撤销”。实际上,《商标法》第41条规定的“撤销”本应属于商标权的无效,第44条和第45条才是关于“撤销”的规定。此次修改《商标法》应当严格区分商标权撤销和无效制度,并对撤销和无效事由作必要的修改和完善。[第一段]
文章出处:
《中国专利与商标》-2007年4期 -88-99页
栏目信息:
分 类 号:
相关文章:
Distinction between Trademark Right Cancellation and Invalidation Systems and Its Significance
Wang Ze (Deputy Director General of the Legal Affairs Division of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce)
Abstract:
Both cancellation and invalidation of the trademark right cause termination of a trademark right. Most national trademark laws clearly distinguish the system of trademark cancellation from that of trademark invalidation. In the current Chinese Trademark Law, however, the concept of "trademark right invalidation" is absent. Instead, the term of "cancellation" is used to refer to the above two circumstances. In fact, "cancellation" as provided for in Article 41 of the Trademark Law should have been "invalidation of the trademark right", and Articles 44 and 45 are the provisions on "cancellation". In the present amendment to the Trademark Law, the system of trademark cancellation should be strictly distinguished from that of trademark invalidation, with necessary revision and improvement made in respect of the causes of cancellation and invalidation.[第一段]

学术















cqvip.com