学术
摘 要:
《中国专利与商标》2007年第3期发表的“专利权利要求中功能性特征的解释原则探析”（以下称“探析”）一文围绕名称为“除臭吸汗鞋垫”的实用新型专利侵权纠纷案，讨论了功能性限定技术特征的两种不同的解释原则。其一是同时发表的北京高级人民法院知识产权庭就该案这一问题给出的解释，即“该功能性限定特征的解释应当受专利说明书中记载的实现该功能的具体方式的限制，[第一段]
文章出处:
《中国专利与商标》-2008年1期 -51-53页
栏目信息:
分 类 号:
相关文章:
Comments on Principles for Construing Function-defined Technical Features in Claims
Huang Min（ Former Senior Examiner of the State Intellectual Property Office）
Abstract:
In the article entitled Exploration of Principles for Construction of Functional Features of Patent Claims published in the China Patents ＆ Trademarks （No.3, 2007） （hereinafter referred to as the article）, the two different principles for construcing technical features are discussed with a study of the case of dispute arising from infringement of the patent utility model for a ＂deoderising and sweat absorbing shoe pat＂. One of the principles is the explanation of the issue by the Intellectual Property Tribunal of the Beijing Higher People＇s Court regarding the case,[第一段]
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com