学术
摘 要:
庄子、惠施展开“濠梁之辩”，探寻知的可能性、根据及知的方式，隐现出不同的思维进路。庄子的探讨进路富有变奏色彩，其以“道通为一”或类的相通为起点，肯定“鱼之乐”可知，进而将惠施“知何以可能”的质疑转化为“知”的方式，最后转换为“于何知”，以“知”的空间场所作结。相对来说，惠施将“异类不比”的逻辑贯彻始终，对认知的可能性保持了悬置的态度。[著者文摘]
文章出处:
《上饶师范学院学报》-2007年27卷5期 -10-13页
栏目信息:
分 类 号:
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1004-2237（2005）-0010-04
The Logical Alternation of ＂Knowing＂ ——On the Potential Route Of ＂the Debate on hao- liang＂
ZHOU Rong-hua （ Shaugrao Normal College, Shangrao Jiangxi 334001, China）
Abstract:
The debate on Hao-liang＂ between Chuangz/and Hnishi to explore the possibility, basis and method of knowing, reveals the various approaches of thinking. The approach at Chuangzi＇ s exploration is full of aherafion, using ＂Unity and the Through- ness＂ as the startpoint to confirm the possibility of knowing ＇the pleasure of fish＂, changing Huishi ＇ s inquiry of ＂How is it possible to know＂ into ＂How to know＂, and then into ＂where to know＂ as the final conclusion ; Relatively, Huishi adheres to the logical principle of nonanalogy among differentkinds, keeping a suspicious attitude of the possibility of knowing.[著者文摘]
Key words:
Chuangzi ; Huishi; the debate on Hao - liang; knowing; the pleasure of fish
更多>>免费文章
cqvip.com